Fermat point

 ( Triangle Centers ) 

In Euclidean geometry, the Fermat point of a triangle, also called the Torricelli point or Fermat–Torricelli point, is a point such that the sum of the three distances from each of the three vertices of the triangle to the point is the smallest possible Cut The Knot - The Fermat Point and Generalizations or, equivalently, the geometric median of the three vertices. It is so named because this problem was first raised by Fermat in a private letter to Evangelista Torricelli, who solved it.

The Fermat point gives a solution to the geometric median and Steiner tree problems for three points.

---

Construction The Fermat point of a triangle with largest angle at most 120° is simply its first isogonic center or X(13), See X₁₃, p. 174. which is constructed as follows:

1. Construct an equilateral triangle on each of two arbitrarily chosen sides of the given triangle.
2. Draw a line from each new vertex to the opposite vertex of the original triangle.
3. The two lines intersect at the Fermat point.

An alternative method is the following:

1. On each of two arbitrarily chosen sides, construct an isosceles triangle, with base the side in question, 30-degree angles at the base, and the third vertex of each isosceles triangle lying outside the original triangle.
2. For each isosceles triangle draw a circle, in each case with center on the new vertex of the isosceles triangle and with radius equal to each of the two new sides of that isosceles triangle.
3. The intersection inside the original triangle between the two circles is the Fermat point.

When a triangle has an angle greater than 120°, the Fermat point is sited at the obtuse-angled vertex.

In what follows "Case 1" means the triangle has an angle exceeding 120°. "Case 2" means no angle of the triangle exceeds 120°.

---

Location of X(13) Fig. 2 shows the equilateral triangles attached to the sides of the arbitrary triangle . Here is a proof using properties of concyclic points to show that the three lines in Fig 2 all intersect at the point and cut one another at angles of 60°.

The triangles are congruent because the second is a 60° rotation of the first about . Hence and . By the converse of the Inscribed angle applied to the segment , the points are concyclic points (they lie on a circle). Similarly, the points are concyclic.

, so , using the inscribed angle theorem. Similarly, .

So . Therefore, . Using the inscribed angle theorem, this implies that the points are concyclic. So, using the Inscribed angle applied to the segment , . Because , the point lies on the line segment . So, the lines are Concurrent lines (they intersect at a single point). Q.E.D.

This proof applies only in Case 2, since if , point lies inside the circumcircle of which switches the relative positions of and . However it is easily modified to cover Case 1. Then hence which means is concyclic so . Therefore, lies on .

The lines joining the centers of the circles in Fig. 2 are perpendicular to the line segments . For example, the line joining the center of the circle containing and the center of the circle containing , is perpendicular to the segment . So, the lines joining the centers of the circles also intersect at 60° angles. Therefore, the centers of the circles form an equilateral triangle. This is known as Napoleon's Theorem.

---

Location of the Fermat point

---

Traditional geometry Given any Euclidean triangle and an arbitrary point let $d(P)\; =\; |PA|+|PB|+|PC|.$ The aim of this section is to identify a point such that

A key result that will be used is the dogleg rule, which asserts that if a triangle and a polygon have one side in common and the rest of the triangle lies inside the polygon then the triangle has a shorter perimeter than the polygon:

If is the common side, extend to cut the polygon at the point . Then the polygon's perimeter is, by the triangle inequality:

$\backslash text\{perimeter\}\; >\; |AB|+|AX|+|XB|\; =\; |AB|+|AC|+|CX|+|XB|\; \backslash geq\; |AB|+|AC|+|BC|.$

Let be any point outside . Associate each vertex with its remote zone; that is, the half-plane beyond the (extended) opposite side. These 3 zones cover the entire plane except for itself and clearly lies in either one or two of them. If is in two (say the and zones’ intersection) then setting $P\text{'}\; =\; A$ implies for every point outside there exists a point in such that

Case 1. The triangle has an angle ≥ 120°.

Without loss of generality, suppose that the angle at is ≥ 120°. Construct the equilateral triangle and for any point in (except itself) construct so that the triangle is equilateral and has the orientation shown. Then the triangle is a 60° rotation of the triangle about so these two triangles are congruent and it follows that $d(P)=|CP|+|PQ|+|QF|$ which is simply the length of the path . As is constrained to lie within , by the dogleg rule the length of this path exceeds $|AC|+|AF|=d(A).$ Therefore, the Fermat point lies at the obtuse-angled vertex.

Case 2. The triangle has no angle ≥ 120°.

Construct the equilateral triangle , let be any point inside , and construct the equilateral triangle . Then is a 60° rotation of about so

$d(P)\; =\; |PA|+|PB|+|PC|\; =\; |AP|+|PQ|+|QD|$

which shows that the sum of the distances sought is just the length of the path from A to D along a piecewise linear line. Now we show that if is chosen to be the isogonic center of the path lies on a straight line - and thus it is minimal. To do this, construct the equilateral triangle . Let be the point where and intersect. By construction, this point is the first isogonic center (see above) of . Carry out the same exercise with as you did with , and find the point . By the angular restriction lies inside . Since is the isogonic center, ; by construction , therefore , and are aligned on the line from to . (Also, is a 60° rotation of about , so must lie somewhere on ). Since it follows that lies between and . Since the path now lies on a straight line, $d(P\_0)=|AD|.$ Moreover, if $P\backslash ne\; P\_0$ then either or won't lie on which means the Fermat point is coincident with the first isogonic center.

---

Vector analysis Let be any five points in a plane. Denote the vectors $\backslash overrightarrow\{OA\},\backslash \; \backslash overrightarrow\{OB\},\backslash \; \backslash overrightarrow\{OC\},\backslash \; \backslash overrightarrow\{OX\}$ by respectively, and let be the unit vectors from along .

$\backslash begin\{align\}$

|\mathbf a| &= \mathbf{a \cdot i} = (\mathbf a - \mathbf x)\mathbf{\,\cdot\,i} + \mathbf{x \cdot i} \leq |\mathbf a - \mathbf x| + \mathbf{x \cdot i}, \\ |\mathbf b| &= \mathbf{b \cdot j} = (\mathbf b - \mathbf x)\mathbf{\,\cdot\,j} + \mathbf{x \cdot j} \leq |\mathbf b - \mathbf x| + \mathbf{x \cdot j}, \\ |\mathbf c| &= \mathbf{c \cdot k} = (\mathbf c - \mathbf x)\mathbf{\,\cdot\,k} + \mathbf{x \cdot k} \leq |\mathbf c - \mathbf x| + \mathbf{x \cdot k}. \end{align}

Adding gives

$|\backslash mathbf\; a|\; +\; |\backslash mathbf\; b|\; +\; |\backslash mathbf\; c|\; \backslash leq\; |\backslash mathbf\; a\; -\; \backslash mathbf\; x|\; +\; |\backslash mathbf\; b\; -\; \backslash mathbf\; x|\; +\; |\backslash mathbf\; c\; -\; \backslash mathbf\; x|\; +\; \backslash mathbf\; x\; \backslash cdot\; (\backslash mathbf\; i\; +\; \backslash mathbf\; j\; +\; \backslash mathbf\; k).$

If meet at at angles of 120° then , so

$|\backslash mathbf\; a|\; +\; |\backslash mathbf\; b|\; +\; |\backslash mathbf\; c|\; \backslash leq\; |\backslash mathbf\; a\; -\; \backslash mathbf\; x|\; +\; |\backslash mathbf\; b\; -\; \backslash mathbf\; x|\; +\; |\backslash mathbf\; c\; -\; \backslash mathbf\; x|$

for all . In other words,

$|OA|\; +\; |OB|\; +\; |OC|\; \backslash leq\; |XA|\; +\; |XB|\; +\; |XC|$

and hence is the Fermat point of .

This argument fails when the triangle has an angle because there is no point where meet at angles of 120°. Nevertheless, it is easily fixed by redefining and placing at so that . Note that because the angle between the unit vectors is which exceeds 120°. Since

$|\backslash mathbf\; 0|\; \backslash leq\; |\backslash mathbf\; 0\; -\; \backslash mathbf\; x|\; +\; \backslash mathbf\{x\; \backslash cdot\; k\},$

the third inequality still holds, the other two inequalities are unchanged. The proof now continues as above (adding the three inequalities and using ) to reach the same conclusion that (or in this case ) must be the Fermat point of .

---

Lagrange multipliers Another approach to finding the point within a triangle, from which the sum of the distances to the vertices of the triangle is minimal, is to use one of the mathematical optimization methods; specifically, the method of Lagrange multipliers and the law of cosines.

We draw lines from the point within the triangle to its vertices and call them . Also, let the lengths of these lines be respectively. Let the angle between and be , and be . Then the angle between and is . Using the method of Lagrange multipliers we have to find the minimum of the Lagrangian , which is expressed as:

$L=x+y+z+\backslash lambda\_1\; (x^2\; +\; y^2\; -\; 2xy\backslash cos(\backslash alpha)\; -\; a^2)\; +\; \backslash lambda\_2\; (y^2\; +\; z^2\; -\; 2yz\backslash cos(\backslash beta)\; -\; b^2)\; +\; \backslash lambda\_3\; (z^2\; +\; x^2\; -\; 2zx\backslash cos(\backslash alpha+\backslash beta)\; -\; c^2)$

where are the lengths of the sides of the triangle.

Equating each of the five partial derivatives $\backslash tfrac\{\backslash partial\; L\}\{\backslash partial\; x\},\; \backslash tfrac\{\backslash partial\; L\}\{\backslash partial\; y\},\; \backslash tfrac\{\backslash partial\; L\}\{\backslash partial\; z\},\; \backslash tfrac\{\backslash partial\; L\}\{\backslash partial\; \backslash alpha\},\; \backslash tfrac\{\backslash partial\; L\}\{\backslash partial\; \backslash beta\}$ to zero and eliminating eventually gives and so . However the elimination is a long and tedious business, and the end result covers only Case 2.

---

Properties

• When the largest angle of the triangle is not larger than 120°, X(13) is the Fermat point.
• The angles subtended by the sides of the triangle at X(13) are all equal to 120° (Case 2), or 60°, 60°, 120° (Case 1).
• The of the three constructed equilateral triangles are concurrent at X(13).
• Trilinear coordinates for the first isogonic center, X(13):Entry X(13) in the Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers

:$\backslash begin\{align\}$

& \csc\left(A+\tfrac{\pi}{3}\right) : \csc\left(B+\tfrac{\pi}{3}\right) : \csc\left(C+\tfrac{\pi}{3}\right) \\ &= \sec\left(A-\tfrac{\pi}{6}\right) : \sec\left(B-\tfrac{\pi}{6}\right) : \sec\left(C-\tfrac{\pi}{6}\right). \end{align}

• Trilinear coordinates for the second isogonic center, X(14):Entry X(14) in the Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers

:$\backslash begin\{align\}$

& \csc\left(A-\tfrac{\pi}{3}\right) : \csc\left(B-\tfrac{\pi}{3}\right) : \csc\left(C-\tfrac{\pi}{3}\right) \\ &= \sec\left(A+\tfrac{\pi}{6}\right) : \sec\left(B+\tfrac{\pi}{6}\right) : \sec\left(C+\tfrac{\pi}{6}\right). \end{align}

• Trilinear coordinates for the Fermat point:

:$1-u+uvw\; \backslash sec\backslash left(A-\backslash tfrac\{\backslash pi\}\{6\}\backslash right)\; :\; 1-v+uvw\; \backslash sec\backslash left(B-\backslash tfrac\{\backslash pi\}\{6\}\backslash right)\; :\; 1-w+uvw\; \backslash sec\backslash left(C-\backslash tfrac\{\backslash pi\}\{6\}\backslash right)$

where respectively denote the Boolean domain .

• The isogonal conjugate of X(13) is the isodynamic point, X(15):Entry X(15) in the Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers

:$\backslash sin\backslash left(A+\backslash tfrac\{\backslash pi\}\{3\}\backslash right)\; :\; \backslash sin\backslash left(B+\backslash tfrac\{\backslash pi\}\{3\}\backslash right)\; :\; \backslash sin\backslash left(C+\backslash tfrac\{\backslash pi\}\{3\}\backslash right).$

• The isogonal conjugate of X(14) is the isodynamic point, X(16):Entry X(16) in the Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers

:$\backslash sin\backslash left(A-\backslash tfrac\{\backslash pi\}\{3\}\backslash right)\; :\; \backslash sin\backslash left(B-\backslash tfrac\{\backslash pi\}\{3\}\backslash right)\; :\; \backslash sin\backslash left(C-\backslash tfrac\{\backslash pi\}\{3\}\backslash right).$

• The following triangles are equilateral:
• Pedal triangle of X(13)
• Antipedal triangle of X(14)
• Pedal triangle of X(15)
• Pedal triangle of X(16)
• Circumcevian triangle of X(15)
• Circumcevian triangle of X(16)
• The lines X(13) X(15) and X(14) X(16) are parallel to the Euler line. The three lines meet at the Euler infinity point, X(30).
• The points X(13), X(14), the circumcircle, and the nine-point center lie on a Lester circle.
• The line X(13) X(14) meets the Euler line at midpoint of X(2) and X(4).
• The Fermat point lies in the open orthocentroidal disk punctured at its own center, and could be any point therein.Christopher J. Bradley and Geoff C. Smith, "The locations of triangle centers", Forum Geometricorum 6 (2006), 57--70. http://forumgeom.fau.edu/FG2006volume6/FG200607index.html

---

Aliases The isogonic centers X(13) and X(14) are also known as the first Fermat point and the second Fermat point respectively. Alternatives are the positive Fermat point and the negative Fermat point. However these different names can be confusing and are perhaps best avoided. The problem is that much of the literature blurs the distinction between the Fermat point and the first Fermat point whereas it is only in Case 2 above that they are actually the same.

---

History This question was proposed by Fermat, as a challenge to Evangelista Torricelli. He solved the problem in a similar way to Fermat's, albeit using the intersection of the circumcircles of the three regular triangles instead. His pupil, Viviani, published the solution in 1659.

---

See also

• Geometric median or Fermat–Weber point, the point minimizing the sum of distances to more than three given points.
• Lester's theorem
• Triangle center
• Napoleon points
• Weber problem

---

External links

• Fermat Point by Chris Boucher, The Wolfram Demonstrations Project.
• Fermat-Torricelli generalization at Dynamic Geometry Sketches Interactive sketch generalizes the Fermat-Torricelli point.
• A practical example of the Fermat point

Post Comment